Internationale Implantatstiftung

Wir sind eine gemeinnützige und wissenschaftlich ausgerichtete Stiftung des Privatrechts, die Patientenerfahrungen und Ergebnisse von
Zahnimplantat-Versorgungen nach Knochenaufbau
erfassen und bewerten möchte.

Ziel ist die Erstellung einer Studie zur dentalen Versorgungsrealität in Deutschland / Österreich / Schweiz.

Einsender (Patienten u.a.) erhalten eine fachliche Einschätzung und Bewertung, kostenfrei und vertraulich.

Bitte wenden Sie sich an:
Internationale Implantatstiftung München
contact@implantfoundation.org

Search

119 results:

51. Version 2

2. Treatment principles, requirements, legal framework Indications for the removal of Corticobasal® implants are fully described in Consensus No.1 of the International Implant Foundation,…

52. Version 2

1. Definitions A „corrective intervention“ serves to correct undesired developments or conditions in a BIPS. A distinction is made between surgical and prosthetic corrective interventions.…

53. Version 2

8. Indications, Procedure and Application of Methods for Carrying Out Corrective Interventions with Corticobasal® Implants Creation of this 002-Version: IF Board Applicable documents: All IF…

54. Version 1

Literature 1 Consensus on Basal Implants (1999, 2006, 2015, 2018, 2021) , the International Implant Foundation, Munich, Germany.

55. Version 2

1 Consensus on basal implants (1999, 2006, 2015, 2018, 2021), International Implant Foundation, Munich, Germany.

56. Version 1

Literature i Dobrinin O., Lazarov A, Konstantinovic V.K., et al. Immediate-functional loading concept with one-piece implants (BECES/BECES N /KOS/ BOI) in the mandible and maxilla- a multi-center…

57. Version 1

Copyright: International Implant Foundation, Munich, Germany 2018/2019/ 2020. This version of the consensus document was last reviewed in January 2020. This consensus document was released by the…

58. Version 3

Fig. 16b Anchoring of 2-3 Corticobasal® implants in the aveole of an upper 1st molar. Fig. 16b Anchoring of 2-3 Corticobasal® implants in the aveole of an upper 1st molar.

59. Version 3

Method 16b Insertion of two or three Corticobasal® implants in the area of the upper 1st or 2nd molar as an alternative to anchoring in the area of the tuberopterygoid if Method 10 cannot be…

60. Version 3

Fig. 16a Insertion of two implants into the two alveoli of a 1st upper premolar. The implant inserted palatally runs towards the floor of the nose and palatally past the canine root (Method 9). …

Search results 51 until 60 of 119